It is important for us to understand and get the word out about the polls that we are constantly being shown that have Hillary Clinton in leads that make her, "too big to fail".
First and I would say foremost, in order to steal the election through voter fraud at individual polling stations, and there are numerous ways this is done, they absolutely must show Hillary in the lead in most major polls. John Podesta, Hillary's guru and henchman explains it well in newly released hacked emails as does the entirety of the article below itself.
The second very important thing to understand regarding the polls that are being fostered upon us is that it is in reality a huge Psy-op meant to give Trump supporters the idea that their vote doesn't count, so why even bother to vote?
You could argue that while a huge lead in national polls could persuade Trump supporters not to vote, at the same time it could also persuade Clinton supporters to stay home too because they believe Clinton has the race in the bag, so why bother therefore making this "Psy-Op" a wash.
But that is where another aspect to this type of psychological warfare that comes into play we should consider and gives the advantage of exaggerated polls back to Clinton:
People that are leaning Trump but perhaps aren't extremely dogmatic one way or the other and we all know some of these middle of the road voters, people who don't really keep an eye all that much on politics for example, may just wind up voting, based on exaggerated polls for who they assume will be the winner. For whom the media is manipulating us will win.
The truth is many people that haven't totally "bought in" to an idea or a candidate may often prefer to be on the winning side if for no other reason to not suffer the agony of defeat, but the celebration of victory.
Finally, don't expect this latest Podesta email to garner any traction in the mainstream media, and that includes Fox News. This is information that we MUST understand and we have barely over two weeks to make sure people go and actually vote and take someone who doesn't normally vote, or who normally votes Democrat with you! It is up to us, not someone else to pray and ACT accordingly. It is either We the People, or We the Sheeple in 2016.
Earlier this morning we wrote about the obvious sampling bias in the latest ABC / Washington Post poll that showed a 12-point national advantage for Hillary. Like many of the recent polls from Reuters, ABC and The Washington Post, this latest poll included a 9-point sampling bias toward registered democrats.
Of course, while democrats may enjoy a slight registration advantage of a couple of points, it is no where near the 9 points reflected in this latest poll."METHODOLOGY – This ABC News poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Oct. 20-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 874 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 36-27-31 percent, Democrats - Republicans - Independents."
Meanwhile, we also pointed out that with huge variances in preference across demographics one can easily "rig" a poll by over indexing to one group vs. another. As a quick example, the ABC / WaPo poll found that Hillary enjoys a 79-point advantage over Trump with black voters. Therefore, even a small "oversample" of black voters of 5% could swing the overall poll by 3 full points. Moreover, the pollsters don't provide data on the demographic mix of their polls which makes it impossible to "fact check" the bias...convenient.
Now, for all of you out there who still aren't convinced that the polls are rigged, we present to you the following Podesta email, leaked earlier today, that conveniently spells out, in startling detail, exactly how to rig them. The email starts out with a request for recommendations on "oversamples for polling" in order to "maximize what we get out of our media polling."
The email even includes a handy, 37-page guide with the following poll-rigging recommendations. In Arizona, over sampling of Hispanics and Native Americans is highly recommended:I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.
For Florida, the report recommends "consistently monitoring" samples to makes sure they're "not too old" and "has enough African American and Hispanic voters." Meanwhile, "independent" voters in Tampa and Orlando are apparently more dem friendly so the report suggests filling up independent quotas in those cities first.Research, microtargeting & polling projects
- Over-sample Hispanics
- Use Spanish language interviewing. (Monolingual Spanish-speaking voters are among the lowest turnout Democratic targets)
- Over-sample the Native American population
Meanwhile, it's suggested that national polls over sample "key districts / regions" and "ethnic" groups "as needed."- Consistently monitor the sample to ensure it is not too old, and that it has enough African American and Hispanic voters to reflect the state.
- On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.
- General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions
- Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed
- Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed
And that's how you manufacture a 12-point lead for your chosen candidate and effectively chill the vote of your opposition.
Here is the full report of "Polling & Media Recommendations" from "The Atlas Project."